https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76109 The Tribunal allowed all three appeals due to the lack of evidence supporting the comparability of goods, questionable valuation practices, unreliable evidence, and procedural deficiencies leading to the denial of natural justice. The judgment emphasized the significance of concrete evidence, procedural fairness, and the burden of proof in customs valuation disputes. en-us Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76109 The Tribunal allowed all three appeals due to the lack of evidence supporting the comparability of goods, questionable valuation practices, unreliable evidence, and procedural deficiencies leading to the denial of natural justice. The judgment emphasized the significance of concrete evidence, procedural fairness, and the burden of proof in customs valuation disputes. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76109