<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 415 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76083</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, classifying the products as mosaic tiles and granting exemption under the relevant notifications. The demand for differential duty was dropped, and the invocation of the extended period of limitation and the imposition of penalties were deemed unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 415 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76083</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, classifying the products as mosaic tiles and granting exemption under the relevant notifications. The demand for differential duty was dropped, and the invocation of the extended period of limitation and the imposition of penalties were deemed unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>