https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76079 An appeal dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction was held fit for reconsideration on merits where the appellant had already deposited service tax relatable to the service charges and the dispute was found to be contentious. In these circumstances, further pre-deposit was treated as unnecessary, and the matter was remanded for decision on the substantive issues without insisting on any additional deposit. en-us Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76079 An appeal dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for non-compliance with a pre-deposit direction was held fit for reconsideration on merits where the appellant had already deposited service tax relatable to the service charges and the dispute was found to be contentious. In these circumstances, further pre-deposit was treated as unnecessary, and the matter was remanded for decision on the substantive issues without insisting on any additional deposit. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76079