<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 163 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76067</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai upheld the penalty under section 76 but set aside the penalty under section 78 for delay in service tax payment. The appellants did not dispute the tax liability, and the penalty of Rs. 39,463 under section 78 was revoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 163 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76067</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai upheld the penalty under section 76 but set aside the penalty under section 78 for delay in service tax payment. The appellants did not dispute the tax liability, and the penalty of Rs. 39,463 under section 78 was revoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>