<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 346 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76054</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the rejection of the refund claim for the period prior to 14-3-2006 under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal held that the notification dated 14-3-2006 applied retroactively, allowing the refund claim for the period before its issuance. The decision was based on precedent and ruled in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU engaged in the manufacture and export of Readymade garments, granting consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 346 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76054</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the rejection of the refund claim for the period prior to 14-3-2006 under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal held that the notification dated 14-3-2006 applied retroactively, allowing the refund claim for the period before its issuance. The decision was based on precedent and ruled in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU engaged in the manufacture and export of Readymade garments, granting consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>