<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 321 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76049</link>
    <description>Service tax paid on outward transportation of final products from the place of removal was treated as eligible input service credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The issue turned on the interpretation of rule 2(l)(ii), and the stated appellate and High Court view was that such outward transportation forms part of input service. On that basis, credit was held allowable in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 321 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76049</link>
      <description>Service tax paid on outward transportation of final products from the place of removal was treated as eligible input service credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The issue turned on the interpretation of rule 2(l)(ii), and the stated appellate and High Court view was that such outward transportation forms part of input service. On that basis, credit was held allowable in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>