<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 422 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76048</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing the appeal subject to the payment of costs within two weeks. If costs were not paid, the appeal would stand dismissed. The Court directed the tribunal to dispose of the appeal and related application on merits and in accordance with the law, emphasizing the absence of mala fide intention on the part of the company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 422 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76048</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing the appeal subject to the payment of costs within two weeks. If costs were not paid, the appeal would stand dismissed. The Court directed the tribunal to dispose of the appeal and related application on merits and in accordance with the law, emphasizing the absence of mala fide intention on the part of the company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>