<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 153 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76037</link>
    <description>Service tax on goods transport agency services was not payable by the respondent because the consignment notes showed the goods were supplied to job workers as consignees. The respondent did not fall within the category of consignee or consignor for the liability rule, so freight-related tax could not be fastened on it. The liability had in any event been discharged by the job workers as consignees, making the demand unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 153 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76037</link>
      <description>Service tax on goods transport agency services was not payable by the respondent because the consignment notes showed the goods were supplied to job workers as consignees. The respondent did not fall within the category of consignee or consignor for the liability rule, so freight-related tax could not be fastened on it. The liability had in any event been discharged by the job workers as consignees, making the demand unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>