<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 151 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76033</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper verification and consideration of details provided by the assessee before disallowing Cenvat credit. The decision underscored the importance of adjudicating authorities conducting thorough assessments and discussions on submissions and documents to ensure a fair decision-making process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 151 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76033</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper verification and consideration of details provided by the assessee before disallowing Cenvat credit. The decision underscored the importance of adjudicating authorities conducting thorough assessments and discussions on submissions and documents to ensure a fair decision-making process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>