<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 312 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76028</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the bank&#039;s request for a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the adjudged service tax demand, interest, and penalties. It found that the bank had a strong prima facie case against the demand, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in a related case. The Tribunal determined that the bank, being financially stable, did not pose a risk to revenue if the demands were upheld, leading to the waiver and stay of recovery pending the appeal decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 312 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76028</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the bank&#039;s request for a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the adjudged service tax demand, interest, and penalties. It found that the bank had a strong prima facie case against the demand, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in a related case. The Tribunal determined that the bank, being financially stable, did not pose a risk to revenue if the demands were upheld, leading to the waiver and stay of recovery pending the appeal decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>