<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 130 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76027</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the Rs.22 lakhs received by the assessee was a non-compete fee and not taxable as salary. The Court also found the assessing officer&#039;s estimation of professional income at Rs.2 lakhs per month to be unjustified. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 130 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76027</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the Rs.22 lakhs received by the assessee was a non-compete fee and not taxable as salary. The Court also found the assessing officer&#039;s estimation of professional income at Rs.2 lakhs per month to be unjustified. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>