<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 59 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76016</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi dismissed the appeal concerning the allowance of settlement expenses under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had allowed the expenses as they were incurred for a business purpose, following the principle of commercial expediency viewed from a prudent businessman&#039;s perspective. The Tribunal found that the settlement expenses were deductable under Section 37(1) as they were incurred wholly and exclusively for the business, and the amount paid was less than the contractual liability. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of commercial expediency in determining the deductibility of business expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 59 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76016</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi dismissed the appeal concerning the allowance of settlement expenses under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had allowed the expenses as they were incurred for a business purpose, following the principle of commercial expediency viewed from a prudent businessman&#039;s perspective. The Tribunal found that the settlement expenses were deductable under Section 37(1) as they were incurred wholly and exclusively for the business, and the amount paid was less than the contractual liability. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of commercial expediency in determining the deductibility of business expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>