<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 40 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75995</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the order rejecting the interest claim and directed the Assistant Commissioner to comply with the appellate order within two weeks. The judgment emphasized the importance of upholding judicial discipline and following higher appellate authorities&#039; orders to prevent harassment and ensure proper tax law administration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 40 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75995</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the order rejecting the interest claim and directed the Assistant Commissioner to comply with the appellate order within two weeks. The judgment emphasized the importance of upholding judicial discipline and following higher appellate authorities&#039; orders to prevent harassment and ensure proper tax law administration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>