https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75993 The Court found that the petitioner was not granted a fair hearing before the order in revision was passed, due to discrepancies in the record of personal hearing. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication with a proper opportunity of hearing granted. The Court emphasized the importance of transparency and directed the petitioner or their representative to appear before the revisional authority for documented personal hearings. This decision upholds the principle of natural justice and ensures fairness in the adjudicatory process. en-us Thu, 13 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 May 2010 13:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75993 The Court found that the petitioner was not granted a fair hearing before the order in revision was passed, due to discrepancies in the record of personal hearing. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication with a proper opportunity of hearing granted. The Court emphasized the importance of transparency and directed the petitioner or their representative to appear before the revisional authority for documented personal hearings. This decision upholds the principle of natural justice and ensures fairness in the adjudicatory process. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75993