https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75959 The court found that the appellants were not liable for service tax on transportation charges reimbursed to Nepalese suppliers. The court determined that the appellants did not receive Goods Transport Agency (GTA) service as they only reimbursed the freight expenses to the suppliers, who were responsible for engaging transporters and paying for transportation under F.O.R. basis contracts. The court waived the requirement of pre-deposit for the appeals, stayed the recovery, and allowed the stay petitions. en-us Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75959 The court found that the appellants were not liable for service tax on transportation charges reimbursed to Nepalese suppliers. The court determined that the appellants did not receive Goods Transport Agency (GTA) service as they only reimbursed the freight expenses to the suppliers, who were responsible for engaging transporters and paying for transportation under F.O.R. basis contracts. The court waived the requirement of pre-deposit for the appeals, stayed the recovery, and allowed the stay petitions. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75959