<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 120 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75952</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to reduce the penalty imposed on the respondents, Mandap Keepers, from double the amount to equal the service tax involved. The Tribunal emphasized the authority&#039;s discretion in imposing penalties, aligning with Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The judgment clarified that even when a minimum penalty is prescribed, a lesser penalty can be imposed based on the circumstances. The appeal brought by the revenue was dismissed, affirming the penalty reduction decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 120 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75952</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to reduce the penalty imposed on the respondents, Mandap Keepers, from double the amount to equal the service tax involved. The Tribunal emphasized the authority&#039;s discretion in imposing penalties, aligning with Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The judgment clarified that even when a minimum penalty is prescribed, a lesser penalty can be imposed based on the circumstances. The appeal brought by the revenue was dismissed, affirming the penalty reduction decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>