<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 16 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75944</link>
    <description>The appeal was made against the ITAT&#039;s order seeking rectification, which dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application. Various additions to the assessee&#039;s disclosed salary were disputed, leading to the CIT(A) deleting the additions. The Revenue&#039;s subsequent appeals were dismissed, emphasizing the need for consistency in legal arguments. A rectification application by the Revenue was dismissed by the ITAT, citing the lack of apparent mistakes under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act. The interpretation of this section was crucial, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without any substantial question of law arising.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 16 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75944</link>
      <description>The appeal was made against the ITAT&#039;s order seeking rectification, which dismissed the Revenue&#039;s application. Various additions to the assessee&#039;s disclosed salary were disputed, leading to the CIT(A) deleting the additions. The Revenue&#039;s subsequent appeals were dismissed, emphasizing the need for consistency in legal arguments. A rectification application by the Revenue was dismissed by the ITAT, citing the lack of apparent mistakes under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act. The interpretation of this section was crucial, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without any substantial question of law arising.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>