<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 297 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75916</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore allowed the appeal filed by the party seeking waiver of demand under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, totaling over Rs. 2.2 lakhs, interest, and penalty. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order-in-revision dated 28-1-2009, as it was passed after the statutory deadline of two years from the original order, rendering it unsustainable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the stay petition was disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 297 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75916</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore allowed the appeal filed by the party seeking waiver of demand under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, totaling over Rs. 2.2 lakhs, interest, and penalty. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order-in-revision dated 28-1-2009, as it was passed after the statutory deadline of two years from the original order, rendering it unsustainable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the stay petition was disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>