<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 295 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75914</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai upheld the reduction in penalty to Rs. 5,000 under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, citing precedents allowing the Commissioner (Appeals) to reduce penalties upon showing reasonable cause by the assessee. The revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 295 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75914</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai upheld the reduction in penalty to Rs. 5,000 under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, citing precedents allowing the Commissioner (Appeals) to reduce penalties upon showing reasonable cause by the assessee. The revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>