https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75892 CESTAT (Bangalore) allowed the appeals, holding the contracts were for execution of specific jobs (loading, unloading, bagging, stacking/destacking) and not manpower recruitment or supply. The tribunal found no agreement for provision of individual personnel; the Board's circular on manpower supply therefore did not apply. The impugned orders were set aside and appeals allowed with consequential relief. en-us Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Sep 2025 17:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75892 CESTAT (Bangalore) allowed the appeals, holding the contracts were for execution of specific jobs (loading, unloading, bagging, stacking/destacking) and not manpower recruitment or supply. The tribunal found no agreement for provision of individual personnel; the Board's circular on manpower supply therefore did not apply. The impugned orders were set aside and appeals allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75892