<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 382 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75875</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a motor company dealer, in a case concerning Service Tax liability for providing table space to financial institutions. The Tribunal held that the payments received were for renting space, not for business auxiliary services, exempting the appellant from Service Tax. The Commissioner (Appeals) decision was set aside, granting relief to the appellant based on precedents and the nature of the services provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 382 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75875</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a motor company dealer, in a case concerning Service Tax liability for providing table space to financial institutions. The Tribunal held that the payments received were for renting space, not for business auxiliary services, exempting the appellant from Service Tax. The Commissioner (Appeals) decision was set aside, granting relief to the appellant based on precedents and the nature of the services provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>