<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 393 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75873</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the show-cause notice issued in December 2007 to be barred by limitation for the period from April 2006 to June 2006, considering the revenue neutrality argument and the department&#039;s awareness of the transactions. As a result, the entire demand, including interest and penalties, was deemed not sustainable, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant, ABB Ltd.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 393 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75873</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the show-cause notice issued in December 2007 to be barred by limitation for the period from April 2006 to June 2006, considering the revenue neutrality argument and the department&#039;s awareness of the transactions. As a result, the entire demand, including interest and penalties, was deemed not sustainable, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant, ABB Ltd.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>