<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 169 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75858</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a case involving the demand for service tax on Engineering Consultancy services. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to remand the matter for fresh adjudication was upheld, citing the lack of justification for invoking a longer period and issues with the imposition of penalties. The Trade Notices and interpretation of statutory provisions played a crucial role in the outcome, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and sustaining of the impugned order. The cross-objection filed by the respondents was deemed infructuous, and both the appeal and cross-objection were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 169 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75858</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a case involving the demand for service tax on Engineering Consultancy services. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to remand the matter for fresh adjudication was upheld, citing the lack of justification for invoking a longer period and issues with the imposition of penalties. The Trade Notices and interpretation of statutory provisions played a crucial role in the outcome, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and sustaining of the impugned order. The cross-objection filed by the respondents was deemed infructuous, and both the appeal and cross-objection were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>