<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 168 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75857</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision to grant leniency to M/s. Bhavani Enterprises under section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, reducing the penalty imposed under section 76. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s consideration of the company&#039;s compliance history, payment of tax liability, and status as a small unit in justifying the lenient view. Previous tribunal decisions supporting penalty reductions under similar circumstances were cited, leading to the rejection of the revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 168 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75857</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision to grant leniency to M/s. Bhavani Enterprises under section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, reducing the penalty imposed under section 76. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s consideration of the company&#039;s compliance history, payment of tax liability, and status as a small unit in justifying the lenient view. Previous tribunal decisions supporting penalty reductions under similar circumstances were cited, leading to the rejection of the revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>