<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 306 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75834</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI addressed an allegation against the Appellant for providing security services liable to service tax. The Tribunal remanded the demand related to available invoices for reevaluation due to the inclusion of bills for services beyond security. However, the Tribunal confirmed the demand concerning unavailable invoices. Upon reconsideration, the Tribunal set aside the order on the demand related to unavailable bills, emphasizing the need for a direct connection between services rendered and invoices for accurate tax assessment. The appeal was allowed through remand, rendering the stay application irrelevant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 306 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75834</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI addressed an allegation against the Appellant for providing security services liable to service tax. The Tribunal remanded the demand related to available invoices for reevaluation due to the inclusion of bills for services beyond security. However, the Tribunal confirmed the demand concerning unavailable invoices. Upon reconsideration, the Tribunal set aside the order on the demand related to unavailable bills, emphasizing the need for a direct connection between services rendered and invoices for accurate tax assessment. The appeal was allowed through remand, rendering the stay application irrelevant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>