<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 385 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75823</link>
    <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal for enhancement of penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was dismissed by the court, which upheld the application of section 80 to reduce penalties based on a reasonable cause for the failure to pay service tax. The appeal was deemed unfit for admission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 385 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75823</link>
      <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal for enhancement of penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was dismissed by the court, which upheld the application of section 80 to reduce penalties based on a reasonable cause for the failure to pay service tax. The appeal was deemed unfit for admission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>