<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 163 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75813</link>
    <description>The appellant sought condonation of a 22-month delay in filing the appeal, arguing for merit based on payment of full tax amount and reasonable cause. However, the Technical Member, guided by the Supreme Court precedent in Singh Enterprises case, upheld the non-condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that such delays cannot be excused. The judgment focused on the issue of appeal delay condonation and the lack of merit in the appeal, ultimately ruling against the appellant based on established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 163 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75813</link>
      <description>The appellant sought condonation of a 22-month delay in filing the appeal, arguing for merit based on payment of full tax amount and reasonable cause. However, the Technical Member, guided by the Supreme Court precedent in Singh Enterprises case, upheld the non-condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that such delays cannot be excused. The judgment focused on the issue of appeal delay condonation and the lack of merit in the appeal, ultimately ruling against the appellant based on established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>