<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 111 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75811</link>
    <description>A genuine cost-sharing or pooling arrangement that merely reimburses shared research and development expenses, without managerial, technical or consultancy services or a right to use intellectual property, is not taxable in India as royalty or fees for technical services; in the absence of a permanent establishment, it is also not business income under the treaty. No withholding obligation arises under section 195 on such non-chargeable cost contribution payments. A separately identifiable coordination fee remains taxable, and the use of a single invoice does not change its character or the withholding obligation on that component. The arm&#039;s length nature of the contribution was left open for examination in appropriate proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 111 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75811</link>
      <description>A genuine cost-sharing or pooling arrangement that merely reimburses shared research and development expenses, without managerial, technical or consultancy services or a right to use intellectual property, is not taxable in India as royalty or fees for technical services; in the absence of a permanent establishment, it is also not business income under the treaty. No withholding obligation arises under section 195 on such non-chargeable cost contribution payments. A separately identifiable coordination fee remains taxable, and the use of a single invoice does not change its character or the withholding obligation on that component. The arm&#039;s length nature of the contribution was left open for examination in appropriate proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>