<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 375 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75802</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 could not be sustained without a separate finding on the assessee&#039;s plea for waiver under section 80. The lower appellate authority had applied section 80 only while deleting the penalty under section 76 and had not examined whether reasonable cause also justified waiver of the section 78 penalty. The matter therefore required fresh consideration of the distinct defence, with a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The order was set aside to that extent and the issue was remanded for fresh adjudication on the applicability of section 80.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 375 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75802</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 could not be sustained without a separate finding on the assessee&#039;s plea for waiver under section 80. The lower appellate authority had applied section 80 only while deleting the penalty under section 76 and had not examined whether reasonable cause also justified waiver of the section 78 penalty. The matter therefore required fresh consideration of the distinct defence, with a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The order was set aside to that extent and the issue was remanded for fresh adjudication on the applicability of section 80.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>