<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 103 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75794</link>
    <description>The court considered whether the judgment should be reported in a Digest and dismissed the appeals against additions made by the Assessing Officer to disclosed income. The Tribunal interpreted Section 68 on cash credit representing share capital, applying the Supreme Court decision in CIT v. Lovely Exports Private Limited. Emphasizing the importance of established identity and creditworthiness of shareholders, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, concluding no substantial question of law arose. The appeals were dismissed based on the Tribunal&#039;s correct application of the law and the verified facts of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 103 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75794</link>
      <description>The court considered whether the judgment should be reported in a Digest and dismissed the appeals against additions made by the Assessing Officer to disclosed income. The Tribunal interpreted Section 68 on cash credit representing share capital, applying the Supreme Court decision in CIT v. Lovely Exports Private Limited. Emphasizing the importance of established identity and creditworthiness of shareholders, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, concluding no substantial question of law arose. The appeals were dismissed based on the Tribunal&#039;s correct application of the law and the verified facts of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>