<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 101 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75792</link>
    <description>The court allowed the change in the assessee&#039;s name following a merger. The appeal by the revenue against the ITAT order for the assessment year 1992-1993 was partially upheld. The court modified the order to allow 50% depreciation on leased assets costing less than Rs 5,000 due to their usage for less than 180 days, contrary to the requirement for 100% depreciation. The court did not entertain questions on the validity of re-assessment proceedings under Section 147, emphasizing that depreciation rates hinge on asset usage days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 101 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75792</link>
      <description>The court allowed the change in the assessee&#039;s name following a merger. The appeal by the revenue against the ITAT order for the assessment year 1992-1993 was partially upheld. The court modified the order to allow 50% depreciation on leased assets costing less than Rs 5,000 due to their usage for less than 180 days, contrary to the requirement for 100% depreciation. The court did not entertain questions on the validity of re-assessment proceedings under Section 147, emphasizing that depreciation rates hinge on asset usage days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>