<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 366 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75791</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal directed the Original Adjudicating Authority to reexamine the issues within the original show-cause notices&#039; scope without expanding proceedings at the appellate level. The Tribunal emphasized confining the decision to matters initially raised in the notice, maintaining focus on the original issues. The appeal was disposed of with these directions, without expressing an opinion on the factual aspect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 366 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75791</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal directed the Original Adjudicating Authority to reexamine the issues within the original show-cause notices&#039; scope without expanding proceedings at the appellate level. The Tribunal emphasized confining the decision to matters initially raised in the notice, maintaining focus on the original issues. The appeal was disposed of with these directions, without expressing an opinion on the factual aspect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>