<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 462 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75783</link>
    <description>A material request for transfer of Cenvat credit under rule 8 had not been adjudicated before the demand was confirmed, so the existing order could not stand without examining that issue. To ensure proper determination, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration by the Original Authority after allowing the assessee to produce documents and make submissions. The order was therefore set aside, and the dispute was returned for reconsideration on the unresolved request with a hearing opportunity to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 462 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75783</link>
      <description>A material request for transfer of Cenvat credit under rule 8 had not been adjudicated before the demand was confirmed, so the existing order could not stand without examining that issue. To ensure proper determination, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration by the Original Authority after allowing the assessee to produce documents and make submissions. The order was therefore set aside, and the dispute was returned for reconsideration on the unresolved request with a hearing opportunity to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>