<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 98 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75774</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions in a tax case, emphasizing no jurisdiction for Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, no disallowance of interest paid to the bank, and rejecting additions for alleged excess and shortage of stock. The Court deemed the proposed questions as of academic interest, disposing of the appeal based on the Tribunal&#039;s detailed analysis without identifying substantial questions of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 98 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75774</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions in a tax case, emphasizing no jurisdiction for Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, no disallowance of interest paid to the bank, and rejecting additions for alleged excess and shortage of stock. The Court deemed the proposed questions as of academic interest, disposing of the appeal based on the Tribunal&#039;s detailed analysis without identifying substantial questions of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>