<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 455 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75765</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed based on the precedent set in CCE v. GTC Industries Ltd., where it was held that outdoor catering service qualifies as an input service for business, allowing Cenvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 455 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75765</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed based on the precedent set in CCE v. GTC Industries Ltd., where it was held that outdoor catering service qualifies as an input service for business, allowing Cenvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>