<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 371 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75764</link>
    <description>Input service credit was allowed for service tax paid on canteen services, rent-a-cab services, and group health insurance services, as the controversy had already been decided in the assessee&#039;s own earlier case on identical facts. The prior ruling had relied on Larger Bench decisions, and no contrary factual distinction was shown for the relevant period. On that basis, the credit was held admissible and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief, if any.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 371 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75764</link>
      <description>Input service credit was allowed for service tax paid on canteen services, rent-a-cab services, and group health insurance services, as the controversy had already been decided in the assessee&#039;s own earlier case on identical facts. The prior ruling had relied on Larger Bench decisions, and no contrary factual distinction was shown for the relevant period. On that basis, the credit was held admissible and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief, if any.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>