<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 85 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75755</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the impugned orders-in-original dated 18.12.2009 and 29.12.2009, granting relief to the petitioners, officers of the Central Excise and Customs Departments. The penalties imposed on the officials in the fresh orders were deemed unjustified as they were not parties in the Tribunal proceedings and had been previously cleared without penalties. The Court emphasized the lack of involvement of the petitioners in the Tribunal&#039;s remand order and the department&#039;s acceptance of their exoneration, leading to the invalidation of the penalties. The writ petitions were allowed, with each party bearing their respective costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 85 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75755</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the impugned orders-in-original dated 18.12.2009 and 29.12.2009, granting relief to the petitioners, officers of the Central Excise and Customs Departments. The penalties imposed on the officials in the fresh orders were deemed unjustified as they were not parties in the Tribunal proceedings and had been previously cleared without penalties. The Court emphasized the lack of involvement of the petitioners in the Tribunal&#039;s remand order and the department&#039;s acceptance of their exoneration, leading to the invalidation of the penalties. The writ petitions were allowed, with each party bearing their respective costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>