https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75727 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the attachment of the petitioner's fixed deposit for her husband's income tax arrears. It held that the petitioner should utilize alternative remedies available under the Income-tax Act instead of invoking the court's special jurisdiction. The court emphasized that the petitioner's husband, as the assessee in default, was subject to the attachment by the Assessing Officer. Therefore, the writ petition lacked merit, and the petitioner was directed to bear her own costs and seek redressal through the prescribed tax authorities. en-us Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75727 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the attachment of the petitioner's fixed deposit for her husband's income tax arrears. It held that the petitioner should utilize alternative remedies available under the Income-tax Act instead of invoking the court's special jurisdiction. The court emphasized that the petitioner's husband, as the assessee in default, was subject to the attachment by the Assessing Officer. Therefore, the writ petition lacked merit, and the petitioner was directed to bear her own costs and seek redressal through the prescribed tax authorities. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75727