<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 235 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75719</link>
    <description>The court upheld the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing their automatic application. It determined that the transaction could be classified as a &quot;slump sale,&quot; but this did not absolve the assessee from tax liability. The court also confirmed the Assessing Officer&#039;s computation of book profits under section 115JA and held that the provisions of section 50B were applicable for the assessment year 1999-2000. The Tribunal&#039;s decision on rectification under section 254(2) was affirmed. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed, restoring the interest levied, while the assessee&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 235 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75719</link>
      <description>The court upheld the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing their automatic application. It determined that the transaction could be classified as a &quot;slump sale,&quot; but this did not absolve the assessee from tax liability. The court also confirmed the Assessing Officer&#039;s computation of book profits under section 115JA and held that the provisions of section 50B were applicable for the assessment year 1999-2000. The Tribunal&#039;s decision on rectification under section 254(2) was affirmed. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed, restoring the interest levied, while the assessee&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>