<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 80 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75701</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding penalty under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income. The court held that merely making an unsustainable legal claim in the return does not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars or concealment of income. Where no details supplied by the assessee are found incorrect, erroneous, or false, penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed. The Tribunal, CIT(A), and HC correctly concluded in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 12:05:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 80 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75701</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding penalty under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income. The court held that merely making an unsustainable legal claim in the return does not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars or concealment of income. Where no details supplied by the assessee are found incorrect, erroneous, or false, penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed. The Tribunal, CIT(A), and HC correctly concluded in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>