<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 231 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75692</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under section 271B of the Income-tax Act. It was clarified that since the assessee did not maintain any books of account, the penalty should have been imposed under section 271A instead of section 271B. The judgment emphasized the correct application of penalty provisions in cases where books of account are not maintained, distinguishing between the two relevant sections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2018 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 231 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75692</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under section 271B of the Income-tax Act. It was clarified that since the assessee did not maintain any books of account, the penalty should have been imposed under section 271A instead of section 271B. The judgment emphasized the correct application of penalty provisions in cases where books of account are not maintained, distinguishing between the two relevant sections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>