<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 491 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75680</link>
    <description>The Revenue appealed the Commissioner (Appeals) decision allowing abatement of receipts by the Respondents, a clearing and forwarding agent. The dispute centered on abatements for composite contracts involving clearing and forwarding of cement bags. The Tribunal found the matter required reconsideration due to the composite nature of the contracts. Additionally, the Tribunal noted the Commissioner (Appeals) had not addressed a specific demand in the order, leading to the order&#039;s setting aside and remand for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for further examination and clarification on the issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 491 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75680</link>
      <description>The Revenue appealed the Commissioner (Appeals) decision allowing abatement of receipts by the Respondents, a clearing and forwarding agent. The dispute centered on abatements for composite contracts involving clearing and forwarding of cement bags. The Tribunal found the matter required reconsideration due to the composite nature of the contracts. Additionally, the Tribunal noted the Commissioner (Appeals) had not addressed a specific demand in the order, leading to the order&#039;s setting aside and remand for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for further examination and clarification on the issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>