<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 426 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75675</link>
    <description>The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s delay of 503 days in filing an appeal against the Commissioner of Service Tax&#039;s order. Despite the department&#039;s objections, the Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s reasons for delay satisfactory, considering the appellant&#039;s strong case on merits and previous Tribunal decisions supporting similar delays. Emphasizing the importance of providing valid grounds for condonation of delay, the Tribunal highlighted the need for diligent pursuit of legal remedies and discretion in evaluating explanations for delays. The Tribunal ultimately decided to condone the delay and allowed the appeal to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 426 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75675</link>
      <description>The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s delay of 503 days in filing an appeal against the Commissioner of Service Tax&#039;s order. Despite the department&#039;s objections, the Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s reasons for delay satisfactory, considering the appellant&#039;s strong case on merits and previous Tribunal decisions supporting similar delays. Emphasizing the importance of providing valid grounds for condonation of delay, the Tribunal highlighted the need for diligent pursuit of legal remedies and discretion in evaluating explanations for delays. The Tribunal ultimately decided to condone the delay and allowed the appeal to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>