<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 488 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75669</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the denial of Cenvat credit on various services like Rent-a-Cab, Courier, Air Travel Agent, Maintenance, Repair, and Telephone services. The Tribunal emphasized interpreting &quot;input service&quot; broadly in line with business requirements beyond manufacturing premises, allowing credit if the services were related to business activities. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering the service&#039;s connection to overall business operations for credit eligibility, following precedent cases like ABB Ltd. v. CCE &amp;amp; ST., Bangalore, and CCE, Mumbai-V v. GTC Industries Ltd.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 488 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75669</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, NEW DELHI ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the denial of Cenvat credit on various services like Rent-a-Cab, Courier, Air Travel Agent, Maintenance, Repair, and Telephone services. The Tribunal emphasized interpreting &quot;input service&quot; broadly in line with business requirements beyond manufacturing premises, allowing credit if the services were related to business activities. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering the service&#039;s connection to overall business operations for credit eligibility, following precedent cases like ABB Ltd. v. CCE &amp;amp; ST., Bangalore, and CCE, Mumbai-V v. GTC Industries Ltd.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>