<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 90 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75665</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal, finding the issue of whether &quot;contract carriage&quot; constitutes a &quot;tourist vehicle&quot; and the provider being a &quot;tour operator&quot; under Section 65(115) of the Finance Act, 1994 significant with substantial revenue implications. The case was remitted to the High Court for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 90 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75665</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal, finding the issue of whether &quot;contract carriage&quot; constitutes a &quot;tourist vehicle&quot; and the provider being a &quot;tour operator&quot; under Section 65(115) of the Finance Act, 1994 significant with substantial revenue implications. The case was remitted to the High Court for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>