https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75648 A writ petition for recovery of alleged service tax reimbursement and interest was held unsuitable where the written contract did not impose such liability and the correspondence did not amount to an admission. The dispute turned on contested facts requiring evidence and cross-examination, making Article 226 relief inappropriate. The High Court noted that oral evidence could not override the written material in view of Section 91 of the Evidence Act, and left the claimant to pursue civil remedies if available. en-us Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Apr 2014 11:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75648 A writ petition for recovery of alleged service tax reimbursement and interest was held unsuitable where the written contract did not impose such liability and the correspondence did not amount to an admission. The dispute turned on contested facts requiring evidence and cross-examination, making Article 226 relief inappropriate. The High Court noted that oral evidence could not override the written material in view of Section 91 of the Evidence Act, and left the claimant to pursue civil remedies if available. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75648