<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 57 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75645</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the conversion of &#039;Straight Grade Bitumen&#039; into &#039;Blown Grade Bitumen&#039; through the blowing process does not amount to manufacture and is exempt from excise duty, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s view. Additionally, &#039;Roof Felt&#039; was classified under Chapter Heading 59.09, entitling the assessee to exemption from excise duty based on previous rulings. The Court dismissed the appeals, with each party bearing their own costs, ruling in favor of the assessee in both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 57 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75645</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the conversion of &#039;Straight Grade Bitumen&#039; into &#039;Blown Grade Bitumen&#039; through the blowing process does not amount to manufacture and is exempt from excise duty, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s view. Additionally, &#039;Roof Felt&#039; was classified under Chapter Heading 59.09, entitling the assessee to exemption from excise duty based on previous rulings. The Court dismissed the appeals, with each party bearing their own costs, ruling in favor of the assessee in both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>