<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 72 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75642</link>
    <description>The High Court of PUNJAB &amp;amp; HARYANA ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the denial of the abatement claim by the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Tribunal for the period 1.9.1997 to 18.9.1997 was unjustified. The Court emphasized the importance of timely and clear communication with the Central Excise Authorities regarding production disruptions to support legitimate claims. The decision highlighted the necessity of fulfilling notification obligations and procedural requirements for claiming abatement, ensuring that rightful entitlements are recognized and unjust denials are prevented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 72 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75642</link>
      <description>The High Court of PUNJAB &amp;amp; HARYANA ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the denial of the abatement claim by the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Tribunal for the period 1.9.1997 to 18.9.1997 was unjustified. The Court emphasized the importance of timely and clear communication with the Central Excise Authorities regarding production disruptions to support legitimate claims. The decision highlighted the necessity of fulfilling notification obligations and procedural requirements for claiming abatement, ensuring that rightful entitlements are recognized and unjust denials are prevented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>