<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 56 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75640</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the assessment orders due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to pass speaking orders before proceeding with assessments, as mandated by the Supreme Court in GKN Driveshafts case. The Assessing Officer was directed to consider the objections raised by the assessee and pass speaking orders before finalizing the assessments, ensuring compliance with procedural requirements. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to established legal principles and directed that the issue of limitation should not be raised by the assessee. Consequently, the writ petitions and pending applications were disposed of in accordance with the Court&#039;s directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=113902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 56 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75640</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the assessment orders due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to pass speaking orders before proceeding with assessments, as mandated by the Supreme Court in GKN Driveshafts case. The Assessing Officer was directed to consider the objections raised by the assessee and pass speaking orders before finalizing the assessments, ensuring compliance with procedural requirements. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to established legal principles and directed that the issue of limitation should not be raised by the assessee. Consequently, the writ petitions and pending applications were disposed of in accordance with the Court&#039;s directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>