https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75618 The court concluded that the seizure of goods by the Central Excise authorities was a preliminary measure pending adjudication. The court directed the release of the seized goods upon the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee. The adjudication process was to be completed within three months, with the adjudicating authority independently deciding the issue on merit, including the petitioner's plea against action under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was dismissed as unnecessary. en-us Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75618 The court concluded that the seizure of goods by the Central Excise authorities was a preliminary measure pending adjudication. The court directed the release of the seized goods upon the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee. The adjudication process was to be completed within three months, with the adjudicating authority independently deciding the issue on merit, including the petitioner's plea against action under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was dismissed as unnecessary. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=75618